- Home
- NCAAFB
- CSD Prime Computer Model Rankings After Week Six
October 8, 2019
CSD Prime Computer Model Rankings After Week Six
| Rank | Team | Conf | Change (LW) | Change (YTD) |
| 1 | Alabama | SEC | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Georgia | SEC | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Clemson | ACC | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Louisiana State | SEC | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | Ohio State | Big Ten | -1 | 0 |
| 6 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Notre Dame | Ind | 0 | 3 |
| 8 | Penn State | Big Ten | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | Auburn | SEC | -1 | 3 |
| 10 | Florida | SEC | 1 | -2 |
| 11 | Wisconsin | Big Ten | 2 | 16 |
| 12 | Iowa | Big Ten | 3 | 7 |
| 13 | Oregon | Pac-12 | -4 | 4 |
| 14 | Texas | Big 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Michigan | Big Ten | -3 | -8 |
| 16 | Central Florida | AAC | 2 | 6 |
| 17 | Texas A&M | SEC | 2 | -6 |
| 18 | Utah | Pac-12 | 2 | 10 |
| 19 | Missouri | SEC | 2 | -3 |
| 20 | Baylor | Big 12 | 17 | 30 |
| 21 | Southern California | Pac-12 | 1 | 2 |
| 22 | Mississippi State | SEC | 3 | -9 |
| 23 | Washington | Pac-12 | -6 | -8 |
| 24 | Minnesota | Big Ten | 3 | 14 |
| 25 | Texas Christian | Big 12 | 1 | 0 |
| 26 | Michigan State | Big Ten | 3 | -6 |
| 27 | South Carolina | SEC | 1 | -6 |
| 28 | Oklahoma State | Big 12 | -12 | -2 |
| 29 | Iowa State | Big 12 | 1 | 2 |
| 30 | Louisiana | Sun Belt | 4 | 58 |
| 31 | Pittsburgh | ACC | 21 | 22 |
| 32 | Cincinnati | AAC | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | Boise State | MWC | 2 | -1 |
| 34 | Stanford | Pac-12 | 10 | -10 |
| 35 | Northwestern | Big Ten | 5 | 5 |
| 36 | Miami (FL) | ACC | -13 | -18 |
| 37 | Texas Tech | Big 12 | 20 | 23 |
| 38 | San Diego State | MWC | 13 | 28 |
| 39 | Kansas State | Big 12 | -15 | 15 |
| 40 | Kentucky | SEC | -1 | -4 |
| 41 | North Carolina | ACC | 6 | 21 |
| 42 | Houston | AAC | -1 | 23 |
| 43 | Arizona State | Pac-12 | -1 | -10 |
| 44 | Utah State | MWC | -8 | 29 |
| 45 | Oregon State | Pac-12 | 37 | 56 |
| 46 | Memphis | AAC | -8 | -16 |
| 47 | West Virginia | Big 12 | -4 | -5 |
| 48 | Southern Methodist | AAC | -17 | 41 |
| 49 | Indiana | Big Ten | -1 | 12 |
| 50 | Wake Forest | ACC | -1 | 5 |
| 51 | Virginia | ACC | -1 | -6 |
| 52 | Maryland | Big Ten | 10 | 7 |
| 53 | Nebraska | Big Ten | -7 | -24 |
| 54 | Arizona | Pac-12 | 12 | -7 |
| 55 | California | Pac-12 | 10 | 1 |
| 56 | Duke | ACC | -23 | 15 |
| 57 | Washington State | Pac-12 | -4 | -16 |
| 58 | Brigham Young | Ind | -4 | 0 |
| 59 | Tulane | AAC | 19 | 25 |
| 60 | Fresno State | MWC | -4 | -9 |
| 61 | North Carolina State | ACC | -3 | -26 |
| 62 | Virginia Tech | ACC | 26 | -25 |
| 63 | Florida State | ACC | -4 | -29 |
| 64 | Temple | AAC | -1 | 6 |
| 65 | Hawaii | MWC | -5 | 37 |
| 66 | Florida Atlantic | CUSA | -5 | 13 |
| 67 | Boston College | ACC | 2 | -3 |
| 68 | Mississippi | SEC | 9 | -20 |
| 69 | Louisville | ACC | -5 | 23 |
| 70 | Tulsa | AAC | 21 | 28 |
| 71 | Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 0 | -19 |
| 72 | Air Force | MWC | -4 | 25 |
| 73 | Southern Mississippi | CUSA | 0 | 9 |
| 74 | Tennessee | SEC | -2 | -35 |
| 75 | Arkansas | SEC | 1 | -7 |
| 76 | Western Michigan | MAC | -2 | 10 |
| 77 | Northern Illinois | MAC | -22 | 8 |
| 78 | Toledo | MAC | 5 | -4 |
| 79 | Ohio | MAC | 11 | -7 |
| 80 | North Texas | CUSA | 4 | 0 |
| 81 | UCLA | Pac-12 | -36 | -32 |
| 82 | Colorado | Pac-12 | -15 | -19 |
| 83 | Colorado State | MWC | -13 | 20 |
| 84 | South Florida | AAC | 8 | -9 |
| 85 | Purdue | Big Ten | -5 | -42 |
| 86 | Vanderbilt | SEC | -5 | -29 |
| 87 | Syracuse | ACC | -1 | -41 |
| 88 | Kansas | Big 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 89 | Western Kentucky | CUSA | 13 | 16 |
| 90 | Florida International | CUSA | 4 | -7 |
| 91 | Wyoming | MWC | -2 | -1 |
| 92 | Arkansas State | Sun Belt | -17 | -16 |
| 93 | Buffalo | MAC | -8 | 7 |
| 94 | Army | Ind | -15 | -16 |
| 95 | Marshall | CUSA | 2 | -28 |
| 96 | Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 4 | -3 |
| 97 | Navy | AAC | 2 | 13 |
| 98 | Troy | Sun Belt | -3 | -21 |
| 99 | Georgia Tech | ACC | -6 | -30 |
| 100 | Illinois | Big Ten | -2 | -19 |
| 101 | Ball State | MAC | 8 | 12 |
| 102 | Alabama-Birmingham | CUSA | -6 | -11 |
| 103 | Miami (OH) | MAC | -2 | -4 |
| 104 | Louisiana Tech | CUSA | 0 | -17 |
| 105 | Georgia State | Sun Belt | 10 | 15 |
| 106 | Middle Tennessee State | CUSA | -1 | -12 |
| 107 | Kent State | MAC | -4 | 4 |
| 108 | Coastal Carolina | Sun Belt | -1 | 20 |
| 109 | Central Michigan | MAC | 5 | 13 |
| 110 | East Carolina | AAC | 0 | -3 |
| 111 | San Jose State | MWC | -5 | 5 |
| 112 | Texas State | Sun Belt | -1 | 0 |
| 113 | Nevada | MWC | -1 | -18 |
| 114 | Eastern Michigan | MAC | -6 | -8 |
| 115 | Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 2 | -6 |
| 116 | Nevada-Las Vegas | MWC | 0 | -8 |
| 117 | Liberty | Ind | 2 | 4 |
| 118 | Rutgers | Big Ten | -5 | -14 |
| 119 | Charlotte | CUSA | 1 | -5 |
| 120 | Texas-San Antonio | CUSA | 1 | -1 |
| 121 | Rice | CUSA | 2 | 6 |
| 122 | New Mexico | MWC | 2 | -5 |
| 123 | Old Dominion | CUSA | -5 | -8 |
| 124 | South Alabama | Sun Belt | -2 | -1 |
| 125 | Bowling Green State | MAC | 0 | -7 |
| 126 | New Mexico State | Ind | 0 | -1 |
| 127 | Texas-El Paso | CUSA | 0 | 3 |
| 128 | Akron | MAC | 0 | -2 |
| 129 | Connecticut | AAC | 0 | 0 |
| 130 | Massachusetts | Ind | 0 | -6 |
Related
